Readers may well remember a blissful time over a decade ago when Market Place was pedestrianised. A rather sad episode of party politics reversed this and it became open to traffic. This has facilitated the street being used as a short cut and some on street parking (by whom?) and did nothing for the vast majority of users – those on foot.

It is clear from recent ‘Cabinet’ minutes that the District Council is interested in this being made pedestrian only again. The County Council, which runs highways, is nervous of any more St Peter’s Street fiascos and needs local support from the District Council and from local councillors – and most especially local residents. Local district and county councillors have made clear their support.

Closure is in the transport plan and highways officials are ready and willing to bring proposals to the ‘Highways Joint Member Panel’ (the local county council committee which has influence over highways decisions).

But the county council’s enthusiasm could hardly be described as overwhelming.

Your views would be welcome. Please email me on chriswhite@cix.co.uk

Extract from St Albans District Council Cabinet minutes (6 January):

‘With regard to the possible closure to
traffic of Market Place, (which a Member considered had previously been successful and
popular), once the Plan was adopted the Joint Member Panel would consider priorities, and if
the Panel considered this to be a priority and funding was available this closure could be
considered. Further Member views on this would be welcomed, as well as further discussion
with local traders.’

Councils up and down the country have put children at risk by meeting
central government targets. While requests for court orders remain at an all
time high since the Baby P case, social workers have been reviewing all
their child protection cases alongside CAFCASS (*Children and Family Court
Advisory Support Service)*, the organisation that represents children’s
interests in court.

CAFCASS yesterday announced that in reviewing the cases many children who
have remained with their parents have been put at greater risk than if they
had been taken into care.

Chris White, Liberal Democrat Group Leader, said: ‘We have always been
concerned that central government targets to reduce the numbers of children
on the at risk register and in care would put children at greater risk. If a
child is in danger every effort should be made to ensure their safety.
Central government target setting has put councils in an impossible
situation. To gain a good inspection report the numbers on the at risk
register and the numbers in care must be low.

‘We demand that the Government drop these targets immediately and that
children at risk are properly assessed. If they are at risk they must either
go on the “at risk” register or be taken into the care of the local
authority.’

It would appear that the plans to widen the M25 have been abandonned, presumably to save money (given the recession and the fact that banks are no longer paying corporation tax etc).

This should be welcome: continually expanding roads only generates extra traffic and pollution, as we have seen countless times before. The proposal to use the hard shoulder, something I have observed working successfully in the Midlands, is not without its difficulties and will involve some additional widening in the ‘safe havens’ that need to be created at 500 metre or 800 metre intervals – these are essentially secondary hard shoulders to deal with broken down vehicles.

As ever, though, it is only half a policy. We learn this morning that the Government’s rail programme depended on high passenger numbers and we can only fear that lost reveneues will yet again be recovered by increased ticket pries. Rail is too expensive. If we want a working transport system, we need to make rail affordable and reliable. Ten days ago I was forced to drive to Liverpool and back because of the unreliability of the railway line. This is madness.

It might be easy to suppose that the outrageous Labour plan for a third runway at Heathrow has little impact on this area. Climate change (and it does exist, despite the bleatings of those with a vested interest in motoring or the oil industry) affects us all. The pollution from an expanded Heathrow will affect the planet. But more immediately we are under the flight path to the various expanding airports on or near our county borders. Recent consultations show that revised flightpaths will clip St Albans.

Perhaps even more annoying is the diverted rail investment. The Government clealy does not get it. We DON’T want a new high speed rail line TO an airport. We want high speed rail lines instead of airports.

What can we do? Support the protestors at Heathrow, at Stansted and in Harpenden (concerned about the menace from Luton airport). Don’t fly unless you really have to. Going to Paris? Go by train. Brussels? Train. Spain? Train (yes – really , I did it this summer).

Am I calling for a boycott? A boycott always smacks of hurting yourself to prove a point. If you want to, do it. The point is, however, that travelling by train rather than by air is often more pleasant. There are exceptions, like the west coast mainline. And the pricing policy required by this Government makes train travel seem an expensive way of moving about. But think train first. And don’t use BAA airports.

It is worrying to see that the independent Chair of the Safeguarding Children Board in Hertfordshire has resigned. This is a key post and she had been in office for only a short time. Hertfordshire is very much in the public gaze at the moment because there are some serious doubts about its capacity to protect childen at risk. The resignation of the chair cannot help things. I do hope that a new chair, with the relevant skills and time, can be found to ensure that there are no tragic incidents in Hertfordshire.

If anyone has any concerns about how the county council handles child protection they should contact me – full anonymity is assured.

Residents have been contacting us about this for some time. The problem is with the phasing of the lights on the pedestrian crossing on the High Street. For a long time Herts Highways denied this but have now agreed that there is a problem and that it is fixable. I am told that this change is imminent. We’ll see.