Central Government targets put children at risk

Councils up and down the country have put children at risk by meeting
central government targets. While requests for court orders remain at an all
time high since the Baby P case, social workers have been reviewing all
their child protection cases alongside CAFCASS (*Children and Family Court
Advisory Support Service)*, the organisation that represents children’s
interests in court.

CAFCASS yesterday announced that in reviewing the cases many children who
have remained with their parents have been put at greater risk than if they
had been taken into care.

Chris White, Liberal Democrat Group Leader, said: ‘We have always been
concerned that central government targets to reduce the numbers of children
on the at risk register and in care would put children at greater risk. If a
child is in danger every effort should be made to ensure their safety.
Central government target setting has put councils in an impossible
situation. To gain a good inspection report the numbers on the at risk
register and the numbers in care must be low.

‘We demand that the Government drop these targets immediately and that
children at risk are properly assessed. If they are at risk they must either
go on the “at risk” register or be taken into the care of the local
authority.’

M25 widening seemingly abandonned

It would appear that the plans to widen the M25 have been abandonned, presumably to save money (given the recession and the fact that banks are no longer paying corporation tax etc).

This should be welcome: continually expanding roads only generates extra traffic and pollution, as we have seen countless times before. The proposal to use the hard shoulder, something I have observed working successfully in the Midlands, is not without its difficulties and will involve some additional widening in the ‘safe havens’ that need to be created at 500 metre or 800 metre intervals – these are essentially secondary hard shoulders to deal with broken down vehicles.

As ever, though, it is only half a policy. We learn this morning that the Government’s rail programme depended on high passenger numbers and we can only fear that lost reveneues will yet again be recovered by increased ticket pries. Rail is too expensive. If we want a working transport system, we need to make rail affordable and reliable. Ten days ago I was forced to drive to Liverpool and back because of the unreliability of the railway line. This is madness.

Heathrow is a problem here too

It might be easy to suppose that the outrageous Labour plan for a third runway at Heathrow has little impact on this area. Climate change (and it does exist, despite the bleatings of those with a vested interest in motoring or the oil industry) affects us all. The pollution from an expanded Heathrow will affect the planet. But more immediately we are under the flight path to the various expanding airports on or near our county borders. Recent consultations show that revised flightpaths will clip St Albans.

Perhaps even more annoying is the diverted rail investment. The Government clealy does not get it. We DON’T want a new high speed rail line TO an airport. We want high speed rail lines instead of airports.

What can we do? Support the protestors at Heathrow, at Stansted and in Harpenden (concerned about the menace from Luton airport). Don’t fly unless you really have to. Going to Paris? Go by train. Brussels? Train. Spain? Train (yes – really , I did it this summer).

Am I calling for a boycott? A boycott always smacks of hurting yourself to prove a point. If you want to, do it. The point is, however, that travelling by train rather than by air is often more pleasant. There are exceptions, like the west coast mainline. And the pricing policy required by this Government makes train travel seem an expensive way of moving about. But think train first. And don’t use BAA airports.

Is this the right time to be leaderless?

It is worrying to see that the independent Chair of the Safeguarding Children Board in Hertfordshire has resigned. This is a key post and she had been in office for only a short time. Hertfordshire is very much in the public gaze at the moment because there are some serious doubts about its capacity to protect childen at risk. The resignation of the chair cannot help things. I do hope that a new chair, with the relevant skills and time, can be found to ensure that there are no tragic incidents in Hertfordshire.

If anyone has any concerns about how the county council handles child protection they should contact me – full anonymity is assured.

Queuing problem on Verulam Road

Residents have been contacting us about this for some time. The problem is with the phasing of the lights on the pedestrian crossing on the High Street. For a long time Herts Highways denied this but have now agreed that there is a problem and that it is fixable. I am told that this change is imminent. We’ll see.

BROKEN PROMISES: Herts Highways responds

Updates are shown in italics

BROKEN PROMISE 1:

Lemsford Road: resurfacing was repeatedly promised and I even checked the text of a letter I sent to local residents confirming that it would be done two years ago. Last year I was given further reassurances but am now told that it is on hold awaiting the end of building works.

There is now a tentative date of February next year but they have added in new reasons why they won’t be willing or able to do it: HCC are now publishing an order to close this road temporarily for resurfacing.

BROKEN PROMISE 2:

I was assured that there would be additional markings on Holywell Hill to warn motorists of the pelican crossing – something which is not so obvious among all the usual street clutter. I have been told that ‘safety officers have decided’ that they are not needed.

Herts Highways says: ‘there were reports of red light jumping at a pedestrian crossing in Holywell Hill and some antiskid was provided at the approaches to the crossing point to make the feature more visible and help people feel more secure. It was agreed that the location be monitored and if deemed necessary officers would add additional signage and road markings to supplement the antiskid. This location is in a conservation area near the Cathedral and therefore officers would seek to avoid adding any unnecessary clutter to the street scene. Officers are continuing to monitor this situation.’

BROKEN PROMISE 3:

Years ago I was promised that the various faded and illegible signs in Cecil Road would be replaced by new ones. Year after year this simple task is not done or even started.

Herts Highways says: ‘The signs have been ordered and arrangements are being made for their installation as soon as possible. Officers anticipate the signing installation works being carried out as soon as possible this financial year.’

BROKEN PROMISE 4:

I was given cast iron assurances that the failure to ensure that the pedestrian lights on the High Street were in sync with the Peahen lights would be rectified. That was more than two years ago.

Herts Highways says: ‘The High Street Pelican was upgraded to include “Go bits”. This means that the lights can change when no traffic is seen or that traffic is queuing, which is shown to be helpful and officers are monitoring the current operation.’

My comment: I have seen no appreciable difference. Please let me know if you can see any improvement.

BROKEN PROMISE 5:

I was told that the pavements in St John’s Court would be replaced. Nothing happened until over a year after I had passed this promise on to residents. The situation today is that still only a tiny fraction has been done.

Herts Highways says: ‘The footpaths have deteriorated and officers are arranging to undertake locally funded maintenance works in phases. Phase 1 is complete now and officers now intend to carry out a second Phase 2 of local maintenance works as soon as possible next financial year.’

BROKEN PROMISE 6:

After the failure of contractors to patch Worley Road to an adequate standard, residents were promised that the road would be resurfaced adequately this year. There are no signs of any intention to honour this promise.

Herts Highways says: ‘Surface treatment works are planned to be carried as soon as possible next financial year under the local Super CAT2 maintenance programme, to seal the previous patching works carried out.’

Note from me: ‘Super Cat 2’ is large patching – supposedly a good quality surface short of a complete resurfacing exercise.

BROKEN PROMISE 7:

There have been frequent requests for yellow lines at the corner of Churchill and Jennings Road. This is to prevent pavement parking and is a safety measure to protect young people. I was frequently assured that this was in hand and would be in the next batch of traffic orders. The officers now say they know nothing about it. Their boss now admits that it has ‘fallen off the radar’.

Highways officials are now processing this after my protests. A letter is being sent to residents.